GoMining Strategy Update: Why I Chose GMT Accumulation Over Bitcoin (and Why GoMiners Are Not the Solution)

 


In managing a digital income, flexibility is as important as consistency. Recently, I decided to make a structural change to my GoMining strategy. This isn't a step backward, but a maneuver to make my system "error-proof" and financially more robust.

The Human Factor Limit and the GoMiners Illusion

The "Service" button offers a 3% discount on maintenance, but it requires a daily click. A single oversight is enough to reset the streak and see costs rise.

Some might suggest purchasing a GoMiner (the NFT that clicks for you), but analyzing the numbers makes the answer clear: the cost of these NFTs in GOMINING tokens is enormous compared to the benefit they provide. Spending a fortune in tokens to automate a click is not efficient if that capital can be better utilized within the protocol.

The New Phase: Creating a GOMINING "Shield"

I have decided to temporarily redirect the rewards from my 5.96 TH/s from BTC to GOMINING. The goal is to accumulate enough tokens in my wallet to reach the maximum maintenance discount provided for those who pay costs in tokens.

In this way, the 3% discount from the service button becomes an "extra" rather than a vital necessity. If I forget to click, the farm remains efficient thanks to the accumulated reserve.

The Roadmap to veGoMining

I will continue accumulating (miner + Bounty rewards) until I reach the equivalent of €10 in GOMINING. At that point, Phase 2 will begin:

  • 1. 4-Year Lock: I will lock the GOMINING tokens in Governance (veGoMining).
  • 2. Extra GOMINING Yield: I will start receiving weekly rewards from Governance.
  • 3. Automatic Coverage: These extra tokens will mitigate any potential loss of the 3% discount, creating a free protection system.

Conclusion: A Smarter ROI

Only once this shield is active will I return to generating Bitcoin. At that point, every satoshi extracted will be much closer to net profit, thanks to three levels of cost reduction: GOMINING payment discount + Bounty Program + veGoMining rewards.

Instead of giving away tokens for an overpriced "clicker" NFT, I chose to invest those tokens back into my own farm. Less dependence on time, more solidity from the protocol.

What do you think of this defensive maneuver? Would you prefer the manual click or would you rather invest in automation? Leave a comment below to let me know your strategy! To stay updated, don't forget to follow the blog by clicking the button at the top left.

Support My Work

Analyzing these strategies requires time and constant testing. If you want to help me continue publishing content on Rendite Digitali, you can use my referral links:

Remember that even applying this strategy is no guarantee of economic return, so you should only invest what you are willing to lose.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LUNC Burn Surge: Definitive Confirmation That Our Strategy Is Correct

Image
  The data from the January 30, 2026, article is clear: the "surge" in burns on Terra Classic is not an isolated event, but the unmistakable signal of a community that has taken total control following the disengagement of Terraform Labs (TFL). For us, this is not just a market update, but a technical validation of the strategy we are pursuing on this blog. Here is why this wave of burns confirms the effectiveness of our architecture: 1. From Passive Deflation to Active Deflation The article highlights how burn mechanisms are accelerating thanks to the initiative of independent developers. This is the heart of our project: while "passive" burns (on-chain taxes) do their job, "active" burns generated by utility and dApps are what guarantee long-term growth. The dApp we are testing fits perfectly into this trend, transforming utility into supply reduction. 2. Strategic Synergy with Staking The constant increase in burns attra...
Read more

LUNC: Total Independence. Here’s How I Reorganized My Ecosystem

Image
  The latest news regarding the cancellation of the Terraform Labs (TFL) hearing and the extension of the liquidation to December 31, 2026, is not just a legal update: it is the definitive Declaration of Independence for Terra Classic. While the market watches distractedly, those who analyze the data know we are witnessing a unique case: a blockchain that has lost its "parents" and has become, by necessity and strength, the most decentralized asset in the crypto landscape. The network now belongs 100% to the community and the validators. It is precisely this extreme decentralization that has pushed me to double down on my commitment. Decentralization: I Saw It Coming While many assets are still seeking the difficult balance between centralized governance (foundations, key figures) and freedom, LUNC has skipped the stages. With TFL in a "terminal phase," we have a "clear track" away from legal interferences to build, bu...
Read more

Why I Changed My Strategy and What I’m Doing Now

Image
  The cryptocurrency market is an evolving landscape, and Terra Classic (LUNC) is no exception. After months of monitoring the network's progress and community governance, I reached a turning point that forced me to re-evaluate my approach. This isn't about giving up; it's about evolving. The Need for a New Direction In the beginning, my plan was based on specific expectations regarding the burn rate and development speed. However, as the ecosystem transitioned into a fully decentralized entity post-Terraform Labs, the variables changed. I realized that a static strategy is a failing strategy in this market. Market Realism: Accepting that the recovery path is longer and more complex than initially predicted. Risk Management: Reducing exposure to high-volatility swings while maintaining a core position for long-term growth. Technical Focus: Prioritizing network stability and dApp utility (like the Lumos Luna SDK) over pure price speculation. A Conscious S...
Read more