LUNC: Total Independence. Here’s How I Reorganized My Ecosystem

 


The latest news regarding the cancellation of the Terraform Labs (TFL) hearing and the extension of the liquidation to December 31, 2026, is not just a legal update: it is the definitive Declaration of Independence for Terra Classic. While the market watches distractedly, those who analyze the data know we are witnessing a unique case: a blockchain that has lost its "parents" and has become, by necessity and strength, the most decentralized asset in the crypto landscape.

The network now belongs 100% to the community and the validators. It is precisely this extreme decentralization that has pushed me to double down on my commitment.

Decentralization: I Saw It Coming

While many assets are still seeking the difficult balance between centralized governance (foundations, key figures) and freedom, LUNC has skipped the stages. With TFL in a "terminal phase," we have a "clear track" away from legal interferences to build, burn, and consolidate.

My New Architecture: Keplr + Galaxy Station

To respond to this new era, I have decided to evolve the management of my assets to clearly separate security capital from technical operations:

  • The Staking Core (4,000,000 LUNC): I have consolidated my position on Keplr, distributing the capital with a 50/50 balance between two pillars of the network: Lunanauts and Terra Classic Node. This choice reduces risks and actively supports the infrastructure.
  • Galaxy Station (The Operational Hub): I have created a new wallet on Galaxy Station that will serve as a "receptor" for the proceeds of my development work and for all rewards generated by the ecosystem. This separation allows me to monitor the profitability of my technical activity with surgical precision.

Accumulation and Burn Strategy

  1. Strategic Accumulation: I use exchanges (Binance and Crypto.com) exclusively to accumulate during bearish phases.
  2. 500k Threshold: Every time I reach a block of 500,000 LUNC, these are transferred and put into staking to generate further income and support the network.
  3. The Development Engine: The dApp I am testing will be the beating heart of the burn, directly linked to my personal portfolio, to demonstrate that real utility is the only path for long-term growth.

2026 will be the year of truth. I am ready.

Did you like this article? Leave a comment below to let me know what you think about the current LUNC situation and my strategy! If you want to stay updated on my posts, don't forget to follow the blog by clicking the appropriate button at the top left.

Support My Work

Writing these analyses takes time and research. If you want to help me continue, you can use my referral links to sign up for the platforms I personally use:

Remember that even applying this strategy is no guarantee of economic return, so you should only invest what you are willing to lose.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LUNC Burn Surge: Definitive Confirmation That Our Strategy Is Correct

Image
  The data from the January 30, 2026, article is clear: the "surge" in burns on Terra Classic is not an isolated event, but the unmistakable signal of a community that has taken total control following the disengagement of Terraform Labs (TFL). For us, this is not just a market update, but a technical validation of the strategy we are pursuing on this blog. Here is why this wave of burns confirms the effectiveness of our architecture: 1. From Passive Deflation to Active Deflation The article highlights how burn mechanisms are accelerating thanks to the initiative of independent developers. This is the heart of our project: while "passive" burns (on-chain taxes) do their job, "active" burns generated by utility and dApps are what guarantee long-term growth. The dApp we are testing fits perfectly into this trend, transforming utility into supply reduction. 2. Strategic Synergy with Staking The constant increase in burns attra...
Read more

GoMining Strategy Update: Why I Chose GMT Accumulation Over Bitcoin (and Why GoMiners Are Not the Solution)

Image
  In managing a digital income, flexibility is as important as consistency. Recently, I decided to make a structural change to my GoMining strategy. This isn't a step backward, but a maneuver to make my system "error-proof" and financially more robust. The Human Factor Limit and the GoMiners Illusion The "Service" button offers a 3% discount on maintenance, but it requires a daily click. A single oversight is enough to reset the streak and see costs rise. Some might suggest purchasing a GoMiner (the NFT that clicks for you), but analyzing the numbers makes the answer clear: the cost of these NFTs in GOMINING tokens is enormous compared to the benefit they provide. Spending a fortune in tokens to automate a click is not efficient if that capital can be better utilized within the protocol. The New Phase: Creating a GOMINING "Shield" I have decided to temporarily redirect the rewards from my 5.96 TH/s ...
Read more